In my previous post about Wallace Stevens I mentioned that one great admirer of Steven’s richly complex later poems is the (experimental? avant-garde? interesting?) poet Susan Howe.
And like Stevens, she has some of the most delightful titles for her poems and books of poems. One of my favorites is her relatively early book, Defenestration of Prague, which was published by The Kulchur Foundation in 1983. I wish I still had that small-run first edition, with it’s lovely cover.
Susan Howe owns her deep Yankee roots and has focused on such topics in her writing as Emily Dickinson, the Indian Wars in New England, Cotton Mather, Mary Rowlandson’s captivity tale, the pragmatist philosopher Charles S. Pierce, and the attempts at utopia by the Labadists. It’s a wide-ranging and interlaced map of references, and Howe’s poetry, on top of that, is a sometimes elated play with pure language.
In fact, she’s usually associated with the LANGUAGE poets, the loose group of post-structuralist writers who rose to prominence in the late-70s and 80s, who broke many literary conventions and rebelled against the ego-centered emotive lyrical poetry embodied by the Beats and the Confessional poets.
I think Steven Paul Martin gives an insightful description of Howe’s poetic practice:
“by asking us to focus on the tangible presence of language itself—on the morphemes, phonemes and graphemes that words are made of—Howe moves us away from our tendency to think in abstractions, easing us into the motion and fabric of a verbal space that has not been reduced to a mere zone of representation. We are asked to see and hear the shapes and sounds of the words instead of reading through them to what they supposedly refer to. Our sense of discursive or narrative continuity shatters, replaced with the endless Protean linkages that give language its living power.”
The implications, to my mind, for photography are deep and broad. Reading Susan Howe is like completely refreshing one’s understanding of how meaning is made. She is sincerely inventive, in that she’s not just trying to be novel or obscure or difficult. She’s trying to return to a place where language most fundamentally starts to mean something. And that might not be a bad practice for a photographer to engage.
As with any “challenging” poet, the trick is to not try to rationally understand everything you’re reading, but to move through it, getting what you can from each pass you take at her work. It’s just like reading Shakespeare. If you stop and turn to a dictionary every time you hit something you don’t know, you lose the flow and the potential experience bound into the language. You can always go back later and Google a reference or a word, and then maybe read it again.
You can find out more about Howe, and read some of her poems, at https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poets/susan-howe.
As for a first book, I’d recommend The Europe of Trusts, a collection of three of her earlier books: The Liberties, Pythagorean Silence, and Defenestration of Prague. Published by New Directions, 2002.